A pilot clinical trial of cell therapy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of CD34+ cell therapy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective pilot study, we enrolled 30 patients with HFpEF. In Phase 1, patients were treated with medical therapy for 6 months. Thereafter, all patients underwent CD34+ cell transplantation. Using electroanatomical mapping, we measured local mechanical diastolic delay and myocardial viability to guide the targeting of cell injections. Patients were followed for 6 months after cell transplantation (Phase 2), and the primary endpoint was the difference in change in E/e' between Phase 1 and Phase 2. In Phase 1, the decrease in E/e' was significantly less pronounced than in Phase 2 (-0.33 ± 1.72 vs. -3.77 ± 2.66, p = 0.001). During Phase 1, there was no significant change in global systolic strain (GLS; from -12.5 ± 2.4% to -12.8 ± 2.6%, p = 0.77), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; from 1463 ± 1247 pg/ml to 1298 ± 931 pg/ml, p = 0.31), or 6-min walk test (6MWT; from 391 ± 75 m to 402 ± 93 m, p = 0.42). In Phase 2, an improvement was noted in NT-proBNP (from 1298 ± 931 pg/ml to 887 ± 809 pg/ml, p = 0.02) and 6MWT (from 402 ± 93 m to 438 ± 72 m, p = 0.02). Although GLS did not change significantly in Phase 2 (from -12.8 ± 2.6% to -13.8 ± 2.7%, p = 0.36), we found improved local systolic strain at cell injection sites (-3.4 ± 6.8%, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized trial, transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy in HFpEF was associated with an improvement in E/e', NT-proBNP, exercise capacity, and local myocardial strain at the cell injection sites. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02923609.

Larger End-Diastolic Volume Associates With Response to Cell Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and the response to cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NICM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five-year registry data from 133 consecutive patients with NICM who underwent CD34+ cell treatment were analyzed. All patients received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; CD34+ cells were collected by apheresis and delivered by transendocardial injections. Patients with baseline LVEDV less than 200 mL (group A; n=72) and patients with LVEDV 200 to 370 mL (group B; n=54) were included. Patients with LVEDV greater than 370 mL were excluded (n=7). Favorable ejection fraction response was pre-defined by improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than or equal to 5% at 1 y post-cell therapy. RESULTS: At baseline, groups A and B were comparable with regards to age (52±11 y in group A vs 53±10 y in group B; P=.95), sex (male: 79% vs 83%, respectively; P=.55), creatinine (1.07±0.28 mg/dL vs 1.03±0.21 mg/dL, respectively; P=.21), or N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (1454±1658 pg/mL vs 1589±1338 pg/mL, respectively; P=.80). Baseline LVEF was higher in group A (32.8±8.7%) than in group B (30.2±8.7%; P=.03). During follow-up, there were four deaths in group A (5.6%), and 2 in group B (3.7%, P=.63). At 1-year post-cell therapy, LVEDV decreased significantly in group B (-56±30 mL; P=.003), but not in group A (+12±97 mL; P=.13). On multivariate analysis, baseline LVEDV was an independent correlate of favorable response in LVEF to therapy (P=.02). CONCLUSION: Larger LVEDV was associated with more pronounced increase in LVEF after transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy in NICM patients, informing target individuals with the highest likelihood of regenerative response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02445534.

Stem Cell Therapy for Chronic and Advanced Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in the field of cell therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) of ischemic (iCMP) and nonischemic (dCMP) etiology, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and in advanced heart failure patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support (LVAD). RECENT FINDINGS: In HFrEF patients (iCMP and dCMP cohorts), autologous and/or allogeneic cell therapy was shown to improve myocardial performance, patients' functional capacity, and neurohumoral activation. In HFpEF patient population, the concept of cell therapy in novel and remains largely unexplored. However, initial data are very encouraging and suggest at least a similar benefit in improvements of myocardial performance (also diastolic function of the left ventricle), exercise capacity, and neurohumoral activation. Recently, cell therapy was explored in the sickest population of advanced heart failure patients undergoing LVAD support also showing a potential benefit in promoting myocardial reverse remodeling and recovery. In the past decade, several cell therapy-based clinical trials showed promising results in various chronic and advanced heart failure patient cohorts. Future cell treatment strategies should aim for more personalized therapeutic approaches by defining optimal stem cell type or their combination, dose, and delivery method for an individual patient adjusted for patient's age and stage/duration of heart failure.

Long-Term Effects of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Myocardial Function in Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the long-term effects of angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy on reverse remodeling of the failing myocardium in HFrEF patients. METHODS: We performed a prospective non-randomized longitudinal study on 228 HFrEF patients treated with ARNI at our center. Prior to ARNI introduction all patients received stable doses of ACEI/ARB for at least six months. Clinical, biochemical and echocardiography data were obtained at ARNI introduction and 12-month follow-up. Results At follow-up, we found significant improvements in LVEF (29.7% ± 8% vs. 36.5% ± 9%; p < 0.001), LVOT-VTI (14.8 ± 4.2 cm vs. 17.2 ± 4.2 cm; p < 0.001), TAPSE (1.7 ± 0.5 cm vs. 2.1 ± 0.6 cm; p < 0.001) and LV-EDD (6.5 ± 0.8 cm vs. 6.3 ± 0.9 cm; p = 0.001). NT-proBNP serum levels also decreased significantly (1324 (605, 3281) pg/mL vs. 792 (329, 2022) pg/mL; p = 0.001). A total of 102 (45%) of patients responded favorably to ARNI (ΔLVEF < +5%; Group A) and 126 (55%) patients achieved ΔLVEF ≥ +5% (Group B). The two groups differed significantly in age, heart failure etiology, baseline LVEF and baseline NT-proBNP. On multivariable analysis, nonischemic heart failure, LVEF < 30% and NT-proBNP < 1500 pg/mL emerged as independent correlates of favorable response to ARNI therapy. CONCLUSION: ARNI therapy appears to improve echocardiographic parameters of left and right ventricular function in HFrEF patients above the effect of pre-existing optimal medical management. These effects may be particularly pronounced in patients with nonischemic heart failure, LVEF < 30% and lower degree of neurohumoral activation.

Impairment of myocardial perfusion correlates with heart failure severity in patients with non-compaction cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Non-compaction cardiomyopathy (NCM) is a congenital heart disease characterized by an arrest of the myocardial compaction process. Although NCM patients have impaired formation of microvasculature, the functional impact of these changes remains undefined. We sought to analyse a potential correlation between myocardial ischemia and heart failure severity in NCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 41 NCM patients (28 male and 13 female), aged 21-70 years. In all patients, we have determined left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) by echocardiography. At the same time, serum levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) have been measured, and myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography at rest and on stress was used to define significant myocardial ischemia defined as summed difference score ≥ 2. Myocardial ischemia has been demonstrated in 11 patients (27%, Group A), and 30 patients showed no significant ischemic changes (73%, Group B). The groups did not differ in sex, age, kidney, or liver function. When compared with Group B, Group A had significantly lower LVEF (35 ± 15% in Group A vs. 53 ± 11% in Group B, P < 0.001), higher LVEDV (188 ± 52 mL vs. 136 ± 52 mL, P = 0.007), lower GLS (-9.9 ± 5.2% vs. -14.5 ± 4.1%, P = 0.001), and higher NT-proBNP levels (1691 ± 1883 pg/mL vs. 422 ± 877 pg/mL, P = 0.006). Overall, higher summed difference score was associated with lower LVEF (r = -0.48, P = 0.001), higher LVEDV (r = 0.39, P = 0.012), lower GLS (r = 0.352, P = 0.024), and higher levels of NT-proBNP (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of myocardial ischemia in patients with NCM is associated with worse left ventricular function, dilation of the left ventricle, and more pronounced neurohumoral activation.

Favorable Response to CD34+ Cell Therapy Is Associated with a Decrease of Galectin-3 Levels in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Galectin-3 plasma levels (gal-3) were shown to correlate with the scar burden in chronic heart failure (CHF) setting. As scar burden predicts response to stem cell therapy, we sought to explore a correlation between gal-3 and response to CD34+ cell transplantation in patients with CHF. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of patients, enrolled in 2 prospective trials investigating the clinical effects of CD34+ cell therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP). CD34+ cells were mobilized by G-CSF, collected via apheresis, and injected transendocardially using NOGA system. Patients were followed for 3 months and demographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical parameters and gal-3 were analyzed at baseline and at follow-up. Response to cell therapy was defined as an LVEF increase of ≥5%. RESULTS: 61 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of patients was 52 years and 83% were male. DCMP and ICMP were present in 69% and 31% of patients, respectively. The average serum creatinine was 86 ± 23 µmol/L, NT-proBNP 1132 (IQR 350-2279) pg/mL, and LVEF 30 ± 6%. Gal-3 at baseline and at 3 months did not differ significantly (13.4 ± 5.5 ng/mL vs. 13.1 ± 5.8 ng/mL; p = 0.72), and there were no differences in baseline gal-3 with respect to heart failure etiology (15.1 ± 7.2 ng/mL in ICMP vs. 12.7 ± 4.3 ng/mL in DCMP; p = 0.12). Comparing responders (N = 49) to nonresponders (N = 18), we found no differences in baseline gal-3 (13.6 ± 5.7 ng/mL vs. 13.2 ± 4.9 ng/mL; p = 0.80). However, responders had significantly lower gal-3 at 3-month follow-up (12.1 ± 4.0 ng/mL vs. 15.7 ± 8.4 ng/mL; p < 0.05). Also, responders demonstrated a significant decrease in gal-3 over 3 months, while in nonresponders, an increase in gal-3 occurred (-1.5 ± 5.4 ng/mL vs. +2.7 ± 4.3 ng/mL; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure undergoing CD34+ cell therapy, a decrease in galectin-3 plasma levels is associated with beneficial response to this treatment modality. Further prospective data is warranted to confirm our findings and to deepen our understanding of the role of gal-3 in the field of stem cell therapy.

Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Therapy does not Increase the Risk of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are of major concern in the field of cell therapy, potentially limiting its safety and efficacy. We sought to investigate the effects of CD34+ cell therapy on VA burden in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). We performed registry data analysis of patients with CHF and implanted ICD/CRT devices treated with transendocardial CD 34+ cell therapy. Demographic, echocardiographic, and biochemical parameters were analyzed. Device records were reviewed and the number and type of VA 1 year prior to and 1 year after cell therapy were analyzed. All patients underwent electroanatomical mapping, and myocardial scar was defined as unipolar voltage (UV) <8.3 mV and linear local shortening (LLS) <6%. Of 209 patients screened, 48 met inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 52 years and 88% were male. Nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy were present in 55% and 45% of patients. The average serum creatinine was 91±26 µmol/L, serum bilirubin 18±9 µmol/L, NT-proBNP 1767 (468, 2446) pg/mL, LVEF 27±9% and 6' walk test 442±123 m. The average scar burden in patients with nonischemic and ischemic DCM was 58±15% and 51±25% (P=0.48). No significant difference in VA burden was observed before and after cell therapy (48% vs. 44%; P=0.68). ICD activation occurred in 19% and 27% of patients before and after cell therapy (P=0.33). According to our results, transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy does not appear to increase the risk of VA in chronic heart failure patients.

Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Transplantation in Noncompaction Cardiomyopathy: First-in-Man Case Study.

Noncompaction cardiomyopathy is a rare congenital heart disorder characterized by an arrest of the myocardial compaction process. This results in the altered formation of coronary microvessels with a resulting decrease in myocardial perfusion. Transendocardial CD34+ cell transplantation has been shown to increase myocardial perfusion and function in patients with non-ischemic heart failure. In our first-in-man case study, we investigated the feasibility, safety and clinical effect of transendocardial CD34+ cell therapy in a patient with noncompaction cardiomyopathy.

Effects of Repetitive Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Transplantation in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

RATIONALE: Preclinical data in heart failure models suggest that repetitive stem cell therapy may be superior to single-dose cell administration. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether repetitive administration of CD34+ cells is superior to single-dose administration in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 66 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, New York Heart Association functional class III, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40% enrolled in the study, 60 were randomly allocated to repetitive cell therapy (group A, n=30) or single-cell therapy (group B, n=30). Patients received G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) for 5 days, and 80 million CD34+ cells were collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. In group A, cell therapy was repeated at 6 months. All patients were followed for 1 year, and the primary end point was the difference in change in LVEF between the groups. At baseline, the groups did not differ in age, sex, LVEF, NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide), or 6-minute walk test distance. When directly comparing groups A and B at 1 year, there was no significant difference in change in LVEF (from 32.2±9.3% to 41.2±6.5% in group A and from 30.0±7.0% to 37.9±5.3% in group B, P=0.40). From baseline to 6 months, both groups improved in LVEF (+6.9±3.3% in group A, P=0.001 and +7.1±3.5% in group B, P=0.001), NT-proBNP (-578±211 pg/mL, P=0.02 and -633±305 pg/mL, P=0.01), and 6-minute walk test (+87±21 m, P=0.03 and +92±25 m, P=0.02). In contrast, we observed no significant changes between 6 months and 1 year (LVEF: +2.1±2.3% in group A, P=0.19 and +0.8±3.1% in group B, P=0.56; NT-proBNP: -215±125 pg/mL, P=0.26 and -33±205 pg/mL, P=0.77; 6-minute walk test: +27±11 m, P=0.2 and +12±18 m, P=0.42). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, repetitive CD34+ cell administration does not seem to be associated with superior improvements in LVEF, NT-proBNP, or 6-minute walk test when compared with single-dose cell therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02248532.

Stem Cell Therapy in Patients with Chronic Nonischemic Heart Failure.

AIM OF THE REVIEW: The aim of this review is to discuss recent advances in clinical aspects of stem cell therapy in chronic nonischemic heart failure (DCMP) with emphasis on patient selection, stem cell types, and delivery methods. RECENT FINDINGS: Several stem cell types have been considered for the treatment of DCMP patients. Bone marrow-derived cells and CD34+ cells have been demonstrated to improve myocardial performance, functional capacity, and neurohumoral activation. Furthermore, allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells were also shown to be effective in improving heart function in this patient population; this may represent an important step towards the development of a standardized stem cell product for widespread clinical use in patients with DCMP. SUMMARY: The trials of stem cell therapy in DCMP patients have shown some promising results, thus making DCMP apparently more inviting target for stem cell therapy than chronic ischemic heart failure, where studies to date failed to demonstrate a consistent effect of stem cells on myocardial performance. Future stem cell strategies should aim for more personalized therapeutic approach by establishing the optimal stem cell type or their combination, dose, and delivery method for an individual patient adjusted for patient's age and stage of the disease.

CD34+ Cell Transplantation Improves Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

We investigated the effects of CD34+ cell therapy on right ventricular (RV) function in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). We enrolled 60 patients with DCM who were randomized to CD34+ cell therapy (Stem Cells (SC) Group n = 30), or no cell therapy (Controls, n = 30). The SC Group received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, and CD34+ cells were collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. Patients were followed for 6 months. At baseline, the groups did not differ in age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, or parameters of RV function. At 6 months, we found a significant improvement in RV function in the SC Group (tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE]: +0.44 ± 0.64 cm, p = .001; peak systolic tissue Doppler velocity of tricuspid annulus [St]: +1.5 ± 2.1 cm/s; p = .001; percent of fractional area change [FAC]: +8.6% ± 5%, p = .01), but not in Controls (TAPSE: -0.07 ± 0.32 cm, p = .40; St: -0.1 ± 1.2 cm/s; p = .44; FAC: -1.2% ± 3.2%, p = .50). On repeat electroanatomical mapping, we found an improvement in interventricular septum viability in 19 of 30 patients from the SC Group; this correlated with the improvements in RV function (13/19 in the improved septum group versus 3/11 in the remaining cohort, p = .029). These results suggest that patients with DCM, changes in RV function correlate with changes of viability of interventricular septum. CD34+ cell therapy appears to be associated with improved right ventricular function in this patient cohort. (Clinical Trial Registration Information: www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT02248532). Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:168-172.

Effects of Transendocardial CD34+ Cell Transplantation on Diastolic Parameters in Patients with Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

We sought to evaluate the physiological background and the effects of CD34+ cell transplantation on diastolic parameters in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patients (DCM). We enrolled 38 DCM patients with NYHA class III and LVEF < 40% who underwent transendocardial CD34+ cell transplantation. Peripheral blood CD34+ cells were mobilized by G-CSF, collected via apheresis, and injected transendocardially in the areas of myocardial hibernation. Patients were followed for 1 year. At baseline, estimated filling pressures were significantly elevated (E/e' ≥ 15) in 18 patients (Group A), and moderately elevated (E/e '< 15) in 20 patients (Group B). The groups did not differ in age (54 ± 9 years vs. 52 ± 10 years; p = .62), gender (male: 85% vs. 78%; p = .57), or LVEF (31 ± 7% vs. 34 ± 6%; p = .37). When compared to Group B patients in Group A had more segments with myocardial scar (4.9 ± 2.7 vs. 2.7 ± 2.9; p = .03), myocardial hibernation (2.2 ± 1.6 vs. 0.9 ± 1.1; p = .02), and longer average local relaxation time on electroanatomical mapping (378 ± 41 ms vs. 333 ± 34 ms, p = .01). During follow-up there was an improvement in diastolic parameters in Group A (E/e': from 24.3 ± 12.1 to 16.3 ± 8.0; p = .005), but not in Group B (E/e': from 10.2 ± 3.7 to 13.2 ± 9.1; p = .19). Accordingly, in Group A, we found an increase in 6-minute walk distance (from 463 ± 83 m to 546 ± 91 m; p = .03), and a decrease in NT-proBNP (from 2140 ± 1743 pg/ml to 863 ± 836 pg/ml; p = .02). In nonischemic DCM, diastolic dysfunction appears to correlate with areas of myocardial scar and hibernation. Transendocardial CD34+ cell transplantation may improve diastolic parameters in this patient cohort. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2017;6:1515-1521.

Electroanatomic Properties of the Myocardium Predict Response to CD34+ Cell Therapy in Patients With Ischemic and Nonischemic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: We investigated a correlation between electromechanical properties of the myocardium and response to CD34+ cell therapy in patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 40 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and 40 with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). All patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%. CD34+ cells were mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and collected via apheresis. Electroanatomic mapping was performed to define areas of myocardial scar and hibernation, and CD34+ cells were injected transendocardially in the hibernating areas. Patient were followed for 6 months; responders were defined as patients with LVEF increase of >5%. At baseline, the groups did not differ in sex, LVEF, creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide or electroanatomic parameters (scar area: 53 ± 18% in ICM vs 55 ± 23% in DCM [P = .83]; hibernating area: 23 ± 13% vs 22 ± 12% [P = .56]). At 6 months we found similar rates of responders in both groups (60% in ICM vs 65% in DCM [P = .95]). When compared with nonresponders, responders had less myocardial scar (47 ± 17% vs 58 ± 15% [P = .003]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic heart failure due to ICM and DCM we observed similar electroanatomic properties of the myocardium. In both groups, lower myocardial scar burden was associated with better clinical response to CD34+ cell therapy.

Efficacy of CD34+ Stem Cell Therapy in Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Is Absent in Patients With Diabetes but Preserved in Patients With Insulin Resistance.

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the association of diabetes and insulin resistance with the response to cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A total of 45 outpatients with DCM received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. CD34(+) cells were then collected by apheresis and injected transendocardially. Twelve patients had diabetes mellitus (DM group), 17 had insulin resistance (IR group), and 16 displayed normal glucose metabolism (no-IR group). After stimulation, we found higher numbers of CD34(+) cells in the IR group (94 ± 73 × 10(6) cells per liter) than in the no-IR group (54 ± 35 × 10(6) cells per liter) or DM group (31 ± 20 × 10(6) cells per liter; p = .005). Similarly, apheresis yielded the highest numbers of CD34(+) cells in the IR group (IR group, 216 ± 110 × 10(6) cells; no-IR group, 127 ± 82 × 10(6) cells; DM group, 77 ± 83 × 10(6) cells; p = .002). Six months after cell therapy, we found an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction in the IR group (+5.6% ± 6.9%) and the no-IR group (+4.4% ± 7.2%) but not in the DM group (-0.9% ± 5.4%; p = .035). The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased in the IR and no-IR groups, but not in the DM group (-606 ± 850 pg/ml; -698 ± 1,105 pg/ml; and +238 ± 963 pg/ml, respectively; p = .034). Transendocardial CD34(+) cell therapy appears to be ineffective in DCM patients with diabetes. IR was associated with improved CD34(+) stem cell mobilization and a preserved clinical response to cell therapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The present study is the first clinical study directly evaluating the effects of altered glucose metabolism on the efficacy of CD34(+) stem cell therapy in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The results offer critical insights into the physiology of stem cell mobilization in heart failure and possibly an explanation for the often conflicting results obtained with stem cell therapy for heart failure. These results demonstrate that patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and diabetes do not benefit from autologous CD34(+) cell therapy. This finding could serve as a useful tool when selecting heart failure patients for future clinical studies in the field of stem cell therapy.

Effects of transendocardial CD34+ cell transplantation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of transendocardial CD34(+) cell transplantation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective crossover study, we enrolled 33 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy with New York Heart Association class III and left ventricular ejection fraction <40%. In phase 1, patients were treated with medical therapy for 6 months. Thereafter, all patients underwent transendocardial CD34(+) cell transplantation. Peripheral blood CD34(+) cells were mobilized by granulocyte colony stimulating factor, collected via apheresis, and injected transendocardially in the areas of hibernating myocardium. Patients were followed up for 6 months after the procedure (phase 2). Two patients died during phase 1 and none during phase 2. The remaining 31 patients were 85% men, aged 57±6 years. In phase 1, we found no change in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 25.2±6.2% to 27.1±6.6%; P=0.23), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (from 3322±3411 to 3672±5165 pg/mL; P=0.75) or 6-minute walk distance (from 373±68 to 411±116 m; P=0.17). In contrast, in phase 2 there was an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (from 27.1±6.6% to 34.9±10.9%; P=0.001), increase in 6-minute walk distance (from 411±116 to 496±113 m; P=0.001), and a decrease in N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (from 3672±5165 to 1488±1847 pg/mL; P=0.04). The average number of injected CD34(+) cells was 90.6±7.5×10(6). Higher doses of CD34(+) cells and a more diffuse distribution of transendocardial cell injections were associated with better clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: Transendocardial CD34(+) cell transplantation may be associated with improved left ventricular function, decreased N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and better exercise capacity in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. These effects seem to be particularly pronounced in patients receiving diffusely distributed cell injections and high-dose cell therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01350310.

Trimetazidine shortens QTc interval in patients with ischemic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Trimetazidine improves functional class and left ventricular function in patients with heart failure; however, its potential impact on QTc interval remains undefined. We analyzed the effects of trimetazidine on QTc interval in patients with ischemic heart failure. METHODS: A prospective trial included 42 patients with ischemic heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] 2 or 3) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (<55%), who were randomly allocated to conventional therapy plus trimetazidine in a modulated release formulation (35 mg twice daily; 22 patients) or conventional therapy alone (20 patients; controls). We measured QTc interval at baseline and after 1 month. RESULTS: At baseline, QTc interval duration was similar in both groups (443 +/- 41 milliseconds in trimetazidine group vs 446 +/- 27 milliseconds in controls, P = .62). After 1 month, QTc interval decreased in the trimetazidine group (404 +/- 36 milliseconds, P = .0002) but not in controls (452 +/- 25 milliseconds, P = .74). QTc interval shortening with trimetazidine was more pronounced in patients with prolonged (>440 milliseconds) baseline QTc interval (-45 +/- 38 milliseconds) than in patients with normal QTc interval (-19 +/- 19 milliseconds P = .04). Significant QTc interval shortening (>20 milliseconds) was present in 14 of 22 patients (64%) in trimetazidine group compared to 3 of 20 (15%) patients in control group (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Trimetazidine therapy is associated with QTc interval shortening in patients with ischemic heart failure.

Levosimendan improves renal function in patients with advanced chronic heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Long-term impact of levosimendan on renal function remains undefined. Prospectively, we evaluated effects of levosimendan on renal function in patients with advanced chronic heart failure awaiting cardiac transplantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 40 patients, 20 were randomized to receive levosimendan (10-minute bolus 12 microg/kg, followed by 0.1 microg/kg/min for 24 hours; LS Group), and 20 received no levosimendan (Controls). The groups did not differ in age, heart failure etiology, left ventricular ejection fraction, and plasma brain natriuretic peptide. Patients were followed for 3 months. At baseline, the groups did not differ in serum creatinine (1.92 +/- 0.13 mg/dL in LS Group versus 1.91 +/- 0.12 mg/dL in Controls, P = .81) and creatinine clearance (43.7 +/- 2.9 mL/min versus 43.9 +/- 2.8 mL/min, P = .84). At 3 months, we found a decrease in serum creatinine and an increase in creatinine clearance in LS Group, but not in Controls, leading to a significant intergroup difference in serum creatinine (1.60 +/- 0.26 mg/dL in LS Group versus 1.90 +/- 0.14 mg/dL in Controls, P = .005) and creatinine clearance (53.6 +/- 8.6 mL/min versus 44.0 +/- 3.3 mL/min, P = .005). An improvement in creatinine > or = 0.5 mg/dL occurred in 50% patients from LS Group compared with 10% of Controls (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan improves long-term renal function in advanced chronic heart failure patients awaiting cardiac transplantation.